And now for your morning fear, uncertainty, and doubt with a big dose of Big Brother:
To a businessman on his way home to be reunited with his family or to a young family going south for a holiday, wearing an EMD safety bracelet for a few hours during a flight is a small inconvenience to ensure their safe arrival.
We feel that, given the choice between taking a flight with the added security of the EMD safety bracelet system and taking a flight without the additional security, many, if not most, passengers would happily opt for the extra security of the EMD safety bracelets.
– pulled from this promotional video
What is an EMD safety bracelet? Why, it’s an Electro-Muscular Disruption bracelet, of course! Yes, the creators of this delightful little piece of security equipment would like to see every passenger on every airplane strap an Electro-Muscular Disruption bracelet to their arms to take a flight. Also, the EMD safety bracelet would contain each passenger’s data and is capable of tracking the whereabouts of said passenger and his/her luggage at all times.
Surely this is just some crazy company with a crazy idea! No one in the US government would be seriously considering this as a security option, right? Wrong.
To make it clear, we are interested in the mobile read/write emitter concept in conjunction with the immobilizing security bracelet, and look forward to receiving a written proposal.
– from a letter written by Paul S. Ruwaldt, Project/Program Lead, Department of Homeland Security
Watch the video linked above and read the news story about it, where you can also find a link to the entire letter written by Paul S. Ruwaldt (which is worth a read as well). I don’t normally read the Washington Times, because I consider it to be a rag of a newspaper, but even a broken clock is right twice a day. No one else is reporting on this yet, but it is making the rounds of the blogs. I’d like to hear it is a hoax, but I fear it’s just one more step on the road we have been on where everyone seems willing to give up all their rights in order to have a sense of safety and security.
I gave up on ever flying anywhere again quite some time ago, so it’s a safe bet I will never be strapping one of these to my arm in order to get on a plane or for any other reason DHS may come up with to use it in other ways. I’d rather live in a shack and eat pine cones and dirt than willingly put on the equivalent of a shock collar controlled by flight attendants ,or anyone else for that matter. I simply will not do it, and no one should.
But people will, and as the video says, “many, if not most.” It’s such a “small inconvenience,” and it makes us safe! Well, no, it doesn’t. It completely robs you of your freedom, furthers the idea that we are all guilty until proven innocent, and I would hate to see what a malfunction or misuse of the system would do to a human being … or an entire planeload of human beings.
My mind is twisted between not even wanting to entertain the idea this is true and being very, very angry. That combination usually leaves me speechless, and it has. I can’t even rant about this. I shouldn’t have to, as I would hope that any freedom-loving human being is as outraged as I am by the mere concept of such a system without me ranting about it. You are outraged, aren’t you? Well, you better be. The slippery slope this country has been on for far too long is fast becoming a free-fall off a cliff. It’s up to us to keep that from happening since “we the people” are supposed to be in charge around here.
Once I have regained the ability to form sentences that do not include curse words, I will be writing my representative and Senators, not that it will help, seeing as they are all neo-con right-wing Republicans who likely think this is an excellent idea. At least it might make me feel better … for a minute or two. I suggest everyone write some letters, because sometimes we have to draw a line in the sand and stand firm behind it. We should have done that some time ago, but now is as good as any to get started taking back our freedom. Unless you like the idea of the “small inconvenience” of being asked to strap an Electro-Muscular Disruption bracelet to your person. If that doesn’t get your ire up, you are either insane or dead. I don’t like the idea of doing it myself, and I don’t like the idea of anyone having to do it. It is simply WRONG.
NOTE: I’d also like to clear up one of the FUD statements made at the beginning of the linked video. To say airport security people were shocked the 9/11 hijackers were able to pass through several security measures is to be disingenuous. Previous to 9/11, it wouldn’t have been at all shocking to security personal at airports for people to pass through security and get on a plane with a box cutter. Or two. Or more. I know this personally, because I used to fly from place to place for my job, and I carried cases — CASES — of box cutters with me in my carry-on luggage, which was the only luggage I traveled with. No one ever batted an eyebrow, because they were not on the disallowed list. I was perfectly within my rights to carry as many of the things as I liked. So, it isn’t at all surprising they had gotten on planes with box cutters. It wasn’t the use of box cutters I found surprising. It was the lack of attention to warning signs that something like 9/11 might happen I thought was surprising. Well, really not even that, but that’s a rant for another time.
Anyway, 9/11 wasn’t caused by people who snuck box cutters onto planes, because sneaking wasn’t required. Any time I was on a plane, I could have outfitted the entire passenger list and crew with their very own box cutter, and security new all about them after checking my luggage, which they always did quite throughly owing to my blowdyer making them think I was carrying a bomb. The failures that allowed 9/11 to happen had nothing to do with airport security checkpoints and box cutters. The failures happened long before the terrorists got to the airport.
UPDATE:
Lampard, the company promoting this insanity, has issued a statement.
We wish to clear up any misconceptions regarding the EMD Safety Bracelet for Airline Security.
First, Lamperd is not the inventor, we are just the contractor to research and develop this product if the funding becomes available. Secondly, the correspondance [sic] in those letters is between the inventor and the agency - Lamperd was not involved.
The bracelets remain inactive until a hijacking situation has been identified. At such time a designated crew member will activate the bracelets making them capable of delivering the punitive measure - but only to those that need to be restrained. We believe that all passengers will welcome deliverance from a hijacking, as will the families, carriers, insurance providers etc. The F-16 on the wingtip is not to reassure the passengers during a hijacking but rather to shoot them down. Besides activation using the grid screen, the steward / stewardess will have a laser activator that can activate any bracelet as needed by simply pointing the laser at the bracelet - that laser dot only needs to be within 10 inches of the bracelet to activate it.
Feel better now? Me neither.
Oh, and that video also mentioned the new hardened cockpit doors aren’t safe enough, because the terrorists might have plastic explosives. Now how the hell would they get that on a plane? We can’t even take bottled freaking water on a plane and mothers are being forced to drink from their babies’ bottles to prove it isn’t deadly! Oh yeah … more fear-mongering in order to make it seem like the “small inconvenience” of a strapped on Tazer is a great idea.