The clucking heads on CNN believe there needs to be a “crackdown” on bloggers who spread lies and misinformation:
“There are so many great things that the internet does and has to offer, but at the same time, Kyra, as you know, there is this dark side,” Roberts said. “Imagine what would have happened if we hadn’t taken a look at what happened with Shirley Sherrod and plumbed the depths further and found out that what had been posted on the internet was not in fact reflective of what she said.”
But Phillips replied that the mainstream media “can’t always do that.”
“There’s going to have be a point in time where these people have to be held accountable,” Phillips said. “How about all these bloggers that blog anonymously? They say rotten things about people and they’re actually given credibility, which is crazy. They’re a bunch of cowards, they’re just people seeking attention.”
Point number one: I can imagine what would have happened had the media –of which CNN is a large part– hadn’t “plumbed the depths further,” because they didn’t. No major news outlet did. They ran with the story put forth by a blogger without looking into it one tiny little bit until it became obvious they didn’t actually have the whole story. A woman who was doing a great job in her position with the USDA was asked to resign. That’s what happened when they didn’t bother to fact check and plumb those depths. Hell, they didn’t even dip their toes into the fresh water of facts.
Point number two: Why would the media not be able to fact check? That would be an integral part of the job of being a journalist. First one checks the facts of a story, and THEN one reports the facts. One doesn’t report bullshit and then eventually take the time to make sure it isn’t bullshit, at least not if one wants to be considered a journalist/reporter. Presumably, the clucking heads at CNN want to be thought of as journalists and reporters, right? Then they better find time to do their jobs. Doesn’t matter if every other news organization on the planet is reporting the sky is blood red, if it isn’t true, why bother reporting it? Oh yeah, ratings! Who cares about facts!
Point number three: Breitbart isn’t an anonymous blogger. His name is totally plastered all over everything he does, and what he does is spread lies and misinformation. For anyone, let alone a news organization (or the NAACP or the US government) to believe anything he says without thoroughly vetting it is the height of stupidity. How many times does someone have to feed them bullshit while calling it prime rib before they begin to get suspicious of taking the plate and gobbling it down? So CNN and every other media outlet sucked down the bullshit Breitbart was serving up, but now it’s anonymous bloggers that are the problem.
There’s an easier solution to the problem of bloggers spreading misinformation than to attempt to regulate the online speech of millions of people: hold news organizations accountable for not checking into the veracity of the stories they report. There are far fewer of them to regulate and hold accountable, and it is, after all, THEIR JOB TO REPORT FACTS. If they wouldn’t be reading blogs, taking everything they read on the internet as god’s given truth without doing just the barest minimum of fact checking, and then running to the nearest camera to breathlessly spread the word –or bullshit, as it may be– the Sherrod incident wouldn’t have happened, at least not quite like it did.
Is Brietbart to blame for tossing bullshit out there? Yes, but mainstream media is responsible for the story getting spread worldwide and the subsequent stupidities that followed, and we should expect better from CNN (and the other major news outlets) than we do from any blogger (most especially Breitbart) … what with reporting factual news stories BEING THEIR JOB and all.
Can you tell I am still somewhat inflamed about this?